Review



mouse cytokine microarray kit  (R&D Systems)


Bioz Verified Symbol R&D Systems is a verified supplier
Bioz Manufacturer Symbol R&D Systems manufactures this product  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
  • 96

    Structured Review

    R&D Systems mouse cytokine microarray kit
    <t>Cytokine</t> array analysis revealed Pd1-dependent cytokines and chemokines in LPS-treated microglia . A , qPCR showing the decreased Pd1 mRNA in the microglia after Pd1 siRNA (20 nM and 50 nM) treatment for 48 h. All data are presented as mean ± SD. Statistical significance was indicated by ∗∗ p < 0.01, ∗∗∗ p < 0.001, as determined by one-way ANOVA. A : ANOVA, F (2, 12) = 15.32, p = 0.0005; NC siRNA versus Pd1 siRNA 20 nM, p = 0.0022; NC siRNA versus . Pd1 siRNA 50 nM, p = 0.0004; n = 5 wells per group). B , array membranes of protein expression among NC siRNA, NC siRNA + LPS (5 μg/ml), Pd1 siRNA (50 nM), and Pd1 siRNA (50 nM) + LPS (5 μg/ml) groups in culture medium for microglia. C , the expression of one colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF), one intercellular cell adhesion molecule (CD54), two inflammatory factors (IL-6 and TNF-α), and four chemokines (CXCL10, CCL12, CXCL9, and CCL5) significantly increased following LPS treatment, while the expression of one chemokine (CCL4) decreased. A significant increase in the expression of one inflammatory factor (TNF-α) and one chemokine (CXCL9) after treatment with Pd1 siRNA + LPS. All data are presented as mean ± SD. Statistical significance was indicated by ∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01, ∗∗∗ p < 0.001, ∗∗∗∗ p < 0.0001, as determined by two-way ANOVA. (Figure 6C: two-way ANOVA; G-CSF, NC siRNA versus Pd1 siRNA + LPS, p = 0.0016, Pd1 siRNA versus Pd1 siRNA + LPS, p = 0.0021; CD54, NC siRNA versus Pd1 siRNA, p = 0.0245, NC siRNA versus Pd1 siRNA + LPS, p = 0.0185; IL-6, NC siRNA versus NC siRNA + LPS, p < 0.0001, NC siRNA versus Pd1 siRNA + LPS, p < 0.0001, NC siRNA + LPS versus Pd1 siRNA, p < 0.0001; Pd1 siRNA versus Pd1 siRNA + LPS, p < 0.0001; CXCL10, NC siRNA versus NC siRNA + LPS, p < 0.0001, NC siRNA versus Pd1 siRNA, p < 0.0001, NC siRNA versus Pd1 siRNA + LPS, p < 0.0001, Pd1 siRNA versus Pd1 siRNA + LPS, p = 0.0481; CCL12, NC siRNA versus NC siRNA + LPS, p = 0.0012, NC siRNA versus Pd1 siRNA + LPS, p = 0.0017, NC siRNA + LPS versus Pd1 siRNA, p = 0.0012; Pd1 siRNA versus Pd1 siRNA + LPS, p = 0.0017; CXCL9, NC siRNA versus Pd1 siRNA + LPS, p < 0.0001, NC siRNA + LPS versus Pd1 siRNA + LPS, p = 0.0156, Pd1 siRNA versus Pd1 siRNA + LPS, p = 0.0145; CCL4, NC siRNA versus NC siRNA + LPS, p < 0.0001, NC siRNA versus Pd1 siRNA, p = 0.0062, NC siRNA versus Pd1 siRNA + LPS, p < 0.0001, Pd1 siRNA versus Pd1 siRNA + LPS, p = 0.0143; CXCL2, NC siRNA versus NC siRNA + LPS, p = 0.0121, NC siRNA versus Pd1 siRNA, p < 0.0001, NC siRNA versus Pd1 siRNA + LPS, p = 0.0017; CCL5, NC siRNA versus NC siRNA + LPS, p < 0.0001, NC siRNA versus Pd1 siRNA + LPS, p < 0.0001, NC siRNA + LPS versus Pd1 siRNA, p < 0.0001, Pd1 siRNA versus Pd1 siRNA + LPS, p < 0.0001; TNF-α, NC siRNA versus NC siRNA + LPS, p < 0.0001, NC siRNA versus Pd1 siRNA + LPS, p < 0.0001, NC siRNA + LPS versus Pd1 siRNA, p < 0.0001, NC siRNA + LPS versus Pd1 siRNA + LPS, p = 0.0442, Pd1 siRNA versus Pd1 siRNA + LPS, p < 0.0001; n = 3–4 separate experiments per group). G-CSF, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor; IL-6, interleukin-6; LPS, lipopolysaccharide; NC, negative control; Pd1, programmed cell death protein 1; qPCR, quantitative real-time PCR; siRNA, small interfering RNA; TNF-α, tumor necrosis factor-alpha.
    Mouse Cytokine Microarray Kit, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 686 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/mouse cytokine microarray kit/product/R&D Systems
    Average 96 stars, based on 686 article reviews
    mouse cytokine microarray kit - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
    96/100 stars

    Images

    1) Product Images from "Effect of microglial Pd1 on glial scar formation after spinal cord injury in mice"

    Article Title: Effect of microglial Pd1 on glial scar formation after spinal cord injury in mice

    Journal: The Journal of Biological Chemistry

    doi: 10.1016/j.jbc.2025.108489

    Cytokine array analysis revealed Pd1-dependent cytokines and chemokines in LPS-treated microglia . A , qPCR showing the decreased Pd1 mRNA in the microglia after Pd1 siRNA (20 nM and 50 nM) treatment for 48 h. All data are presented as mean ± SD. Statistical significance was indicated by ∗∗ p < 0.01, ∗∗∗ p < 0.001, as determined by one-way ANOVA. A : ANOVA, F (2, 12) = 15.32, p = 0.0005; NC siRNA versus Pd1 siRNA 20 nM, p = 0.0022; NC siRNA versus . Pd1 siRNA 50 nM, p = 0.0004; n = 5 wells per group). B , array membranes of protein expression among NC siRNA, NC siRNA + LPS (5 μg/ml), Pd1 siRNA (50 nM), and Pd1 siRNA (50 nM) + LPS (5 μg/ml) groups in culture medium for microglia. C , the expression of one colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF), one intercellular cell adhesion molecule (CD54), two inflammatory factors (IL-6 and TNF-α), and four chemokines (CXCL10, CCL12, CXCL9, and CCL5) significantly increased following LPS treatment, while the expression of one chemokine (CCL4) decreased. A significant increase in the expression of one inflammatory factor (TNF-α) and one chemokine (CXCL9) after treatment with Pd1 siRNA + LPS. All data are presented as mean ± SD. Statistical significance was indicated by ∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01, ∗∗∗ p < 0.001, ∗∗∗∗ p < 0.0001, as determined by two-way ANOVA. (Figure 6C: two-way ANOVA; G-CSF, NC siRNA versus Pd1 siRNA + LPS, p = 0.0016, Pd1 siRNA versus Pd1 siRNA + LPS, p = 0.0021; CD54, NC siRNA versus Pd1 siRNA, p = 0.0245, NC siRNA versus Pd1 siRNA + LPS, p = 0.0185; IL-6, NC siRNA versus NC siRNA + LPS, p < 0.0001, NC siRNA versus Pd1 siRNA + LPS, p < 0.0001, NC siRNA + LPS versus Pd1 siRNA, p < 0.0001; Pd1 siRNA versus Pd1 siRNA + LPS, p < 0.0001; CXCL10, NC siRNA versus NC siRNA + LPS, p < 0.0001, NC siRNA versus Pd1 siRNA, p < 0.0001, NC siRNA versus Pd1 siRNA + LPS, p < 0.0001, Pd1 siRNA versus Pd1 siRNA + LPS, p = 0.0481; CCL12, NC siRNA versus NC siRNA + LPS, p = 0.0012, NC siRNA versus Pd1 siRNA + LPS, p = 0.0017, NC siRNA + LPS versus Pd1 siRNA, p = 0.0012; Pd1 siRNA versus Pd1 siRNA + LPS, p = 0.0017; CXCL9, NC siRNA versus Pd1 siRNA + LPS, p < 0.0001, NC siRNA + LPS versus Pd1 siRNA + LPS, p = 0.0156, Pd1 siRNA versus Pd1 siRNA + LPS, p = 0.0145; CCL4, NC siRNA versus NC siRNA + LPS, p < 0.0001, NC siRNA versus Pd1 siRNA, p = 0.0062, NC siRNA versus Pd1 siRNA + LPS, p < 0.0001, Pd1 siRNA versus Pd1 siRNA + LPS, p = 0.0143; CXCL2, NC siRNA versus NC siRNA + LPS, p = 0.0121, NC siRNA versus Pd1 siRNA, p < 0.0001, NC siRNA versus Pd1 siRNA + LPS, p = 0.0017; CCL5, NC siRNA versus NC siRNA + LPS, p < 0.0001, NC siRNA versus Pd1 siRNA + LPS, p < 0.0001, NC siRNA + LPS versus Pd1 siRNA, p < 0.0001, Pd1 siRNA versus Pd1 siRNA + LPS, p < 0.0001; TNF-α, NC siRNA versus NC siRNA + LPS, p < 0.0001, NC siRNA versus Pd1 siRNA + LPS, p < 0.0001, NC siRNA + LPS versus Pd1 siRNA, p < 0.0001, NC siRNA + LPS versus Pd1 siRNA + LPS, p = 0.0442, Pd1 siRNA versus Pd1 siRNA + LPS, p < 0.0001; n = 3–4 separate experiments per group). G-CSF, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor; IL-6, interleukin-6; LPS, lipopolysaccharide; NC, negative control; Pd1, programmed cell death protein 1; qPCR, quantitative real-time PCR; siRNA, small interfering RNA; TNF-α, tumor necrosis factor-alpha.
    Figure Legend Snippet: Cytokine array analysis revealed Pd1-dependent cytokines and chemokines in LPS-treated microglia . A , qPCR showing the decreased Pd1 mRNA in the microglia after Pd1 siRNA (20 nM and 50 nM) treatment for 48 h. All data are presented as mean ± SD. Statistical significance was indicated by ∗∗ p < 0.01, ∗∗∗ p < 0.001, as determined by one-way ANOVA. A : ANOVA, F (2, 12) = 15.32, p = 0.0005; NC siRNA versus Pd1 siRNA 20 nM, p = 0.0022; NC siRNA versus . Pd1 siRNA 50 nM, p = 0.0004; n = 5 wells per group). B , array membranes of protein expression among NC siRNA, NC siRNA + LPS (5 μg/ml), Pd1 siRNA (50 nM), and Pd1 siRNA (50 nM) + LPS (5 μg/ml) groups in culture medium for microglia. C , the expression of one colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF), one intercellular cell adhesion molecule (CD54), two inflammatory factors (IL-6 and TNF-α), and four chemokines (CXCL10, CCL12, CXCL9, and CCL5) significantly increased following LPS treatment, while the expression of one chemokine (CCL4) decreased. A significant increase in the expression of one inflammatory factor (TNF-α) and one chemokine (CXCL9) after treatment with Pd1 siRNA + LPS. All data are presented as mean ± SD. Statistical significance was indicated by ∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01, ∗∗∗ p < 0.001, ∗∗∗∗ p < 0.0001, as determined by two-way ANOVA. (Figure 6C: two-way ANOVA; G-CSF, NC siRNA versus Pd1 siRNA + LPS, p = 0.0016, Pd1 siRNA versus Pd1 siRNA + LPS, p = 0.0021; CD54, NC siRNA versus Pd1 siRNA, p = 0.0245, NC siRNA versus Pd1 siRNA + LPS, p = 0.0185; IL-6, NC siRNA versus NC siRNA + LPS, p < 0.0001, NC siRNA versus Pd1 siRNA + LPS, p < 0.0001, NC siRNA + LPS versus Pd1 siRNA, p < 0.0001; Pd1 siRNA versus Pd1 siRNA + LPS, p < 0.0001; CXCL10, NC siRNA versus NC siRNA + LPS, p < 0.0001, NC siRNA versus Pd1 siRNA, p < 0.0001, NC siRNA versus Pd1 siRNA + LPS, p < 0.0001, Pd1 siRNA versus Pd1 siRNA + LPS, p = 0.0481; CCL12, NC siRNA versus NC siRNA + LPS, p = 0.0012, NC siRNA versus Pd1 siRNA + LPS, p = 0.0017, NC siRNA + LPS versus Pd1 siRNA, p = 0.0012; Pd1 siRNA versus Pd1 siRNA + LPS, p = 0.0017; CXCL9, NC siRNA versus Pd1 siRNA + LPS, p < 0.0001, NC siRNA + LPS versus Pd1 siRNA + LPS, p = 0.0156, Pd1 siRNA versus Pd1 siRNA + LPS, p = 0.0145; CCL4, NC siRNA versus NC siRNA + LPS, p < 0.0001, NC siRNA versus Pd1 siRNA, p = 0.0062, NC siRNA versus Pd1 siRNA + LPS, p < 0.0001, Pd1 siRNA versus Pd1 siRNA + LPS, p = 0.0143; CXCL2, NC siRNA versus NC siRNA + LPS, p = 0.0121, NC siRNA versus Pd1 siRNA, p < 0.0001, NC siRNA versus Pd1 siRNA + LPS, p = 0.0017; CCL5, NC siRNA versus NC siRNA + LPS, p < 0.0001, NC siRNA versus Pd1 siRNA + LPS, p < 0.0001, NC siRNA + LPS versus Pd1 siRNA, p < 0.0001, Pd1 siRNA versus Pd1 siRNA + LPS, p < 0.0001; TNF-α, NC siRNA versus NC siRNA + LPS, p < 0.0001, NC siRNA versus Pd1 siRNA + LPS, p < 0.0001, NC siRNA + LPS versus Pd1 siRNA, p < 0.0001, NC siRNA + LPS versus Pd1 siRNA + LPS, p = 0.0442, Pd1 siRNA versus Pd1 siRNA + LPS, p < 0.0001; n = 3–4 separate experiments per group). G-CSF, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor; IL-6, interleukin-6; LPS, lipopolysaccharide; NC, negative control; Pd1, programmed cell death protein 1; qPCR, quantitative real-time PCR; siRNA, small interfering RNA; TNF-α, tumor necrosis factor-alpha.

    Techniques Used: Expressing, Negative Control, Real-time Polymerase Chain Reaction, Small Interfering RNA



    Similar Products

    96
    R&D Systems mouse cytokine microarray kit
    <t>Cytokine</t> array analysis revealed Pd1-dependent cytokines and chemokines in LPS-treated microglia . A , qPCR showing the decreased Pd1 mRNA in the microglia after Pd1 siRNA (20 nM and 50 nM) treatment for 48 h. All data are presented as mean ± SD. Statistical significance was indicated by ∗∗ p < 0.01, ∗∗∗ p < 0.001, as determined by one-way ANOVA. A : ANOVA, F (2, 12) = 15.32, p = 0.0005; NC siRNA versus Pd1 siRNA 20 nM, p = 0.0022; NC siRNA versus . Pd1 siRNA 50 nM, p = 0.0004; n = 5 wells per group). B , array membranes of protein expression among NC siRNA, NC siRNA + LPS (5 μg/ml), Pd1 siRNA (50 nM), and Pd1 siRNA (50 nM) + LPS (5 μg/ml) groups in culture medium for microglia. C , the expression of one colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF), one intercellular cell adhesion molecule (CD54), two inflammatory factors (IL-6 and TNF-α), and four chemokines (CXCL10, CCL12, CXCL9, and CCL5) significantly increased following LPS treatment, while the expression of one chemokine (CCL4) decreased. A significant increase in the expression of one inflammatory factor (TNF-α) and one chemokine (CXCL9) after treatment with Pd1 siRNA + LPS. All data are presented as mean ± SD. Statistical significance was indicated by ∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01, ∗∗∗ p < 0.001, ∗∗∗∗ p < 0.0001, as determined by two-way ANOVA. (Figure 6C: two-way ANOVA; G-CSF, NC siRNA versus Pd1 siRNA + LPS, p = 0.0016, Pd1 siRNA versus Pd1 siRNA + LPS, p = 0.0021; CD54, NC siRNA versus Pd1 siRNA, p = 0.0245, NC siRNA versus Pd1 siRNA + LPS, p = 0.0185; IL-6, NC siRNA versus NC siRNA + LPS, p < 0.0001, NC siRNA versus Pd1 siRNA + LPS, p < 0.0001, NC siRNA + LPS versus Pd1 siRNA, p < 0.0001; Pd1 siRNA versus Pd1 siRNA + LPS, p < 0.0001; CXCL10, NC siRNA versus NC siRNA + LPS, p < 0.0001, NC siRNA versus Pd1 siRNA, p < 0.0001, NC siRNA versus Pd1 siRNA + LPS, p < 0.0001, Pd1 siRNA versus Pd1 siRNA + LPS, p = 0.0481; CCL12, NC siRNA versus NC siRNA + LPS, p = 0.0012, NC siRNA versus Pd1 siRNA + LPS, p = 0.0017, NC siRNA + LPS versus Pd1 siRNA, p = 0.0012; Pd1 siRNA versus Pd1 siRNA + LPS, p = 0.0017; CXCL9, NC siRNA versus Pd1 siRNA + LPS, p < 0.0001, NC siRNA + LPS versus Pd1 siRNA + LPS, p = 0.0156, Pd1 siRNA versus Pd1 siRNA + LPS, p = 0.0145; CCL4, NC siRNA versus NC siRNA + LPS, p < 0.0001, NC siRNA versus Pd1 siRNA, p = 0.0062, NC siRNA versus Pd1 siRNA + LPS, p < 0.0001, Pd1 siRNA versus Pd1 siRNA + LPS, p = 0.0143; CXCL2, NC siRNA versus NC siRNA + LPS, p = 0.0121, NC siRNA versus Pd1 siRNA, p < 0.0001, NC siRNA versus Pd1 siRNA + LPS, p = 0.0017; CCL5, NC siRNA versus NC siRNA + LPS, p < 0.0001, NC siRNA versus Pd1 siRNA + LPS, p < 0.0001, NC siRNA + LPS versus Pd1 siRNA, p < 0.0001, Pd1 siRNA versus Pd1 siRNA + LPS, p < 0.0001; TNF-α, NC siRNA versus NC siRNA + LPS, p < 0.0001, NC siRNA versus Pd1 siRNA + LPS, p < 0.0001, NC siRNA + LPS versus Pd1 siRNA, p < 0.0001, NC siRNA + LPS versus Pd1 siRNA + LPS, p = 0.0442, Pd1 siRNA versus Pd1 siRNA + LPS, p < 0.0001; n = 3–4 separate experiments per group). G-CSF, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor; IL-6, interleukin-6; LPS, lipopolysaccharide; NC, negative control; Pd1, programmed cell death protein 1; qPCR, quantitative real-time PCR; siRNA, small interfering RNA; TNF-α, tumor necrosis factor-alpha.
    Mouse Cytokine Microarray Kit, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/mouse cytokine microarray kit/product/R&D Systems
    Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    mouse cytokine microarray kit - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
    96/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    RayBiotech inc aam-cust mouse cytokine antibody microarray kit
    <t>Cytokine</t> array analysis revealed Pd1-dependent cytokines and chemokines in LPS-treated microglia . A , qPCR showing the decreased Pd1 mRNA in the microglia after Pd1 siRNA (20 nM and 50 nM) treatment for 48 h. All data are presented as mean ± SD. Statistical significance was indicated by ∗∗ p < 0.01, ∗∗∗ p < 0.001, as determined by one-way ANOVA. A : ANOVA, F (2, 12) = 15.32, p = 0.0005; NC siRNA versus Pd1 siRNA 20 nM, p = 0.0022; NC siRNA versus . Pd1 siRNA 50 nM, p = 0.0004; n = 5 wells per group). B , array membranes of protein expression among NC siRNA, NC siRNA + LPS (5 μg/ml), Pd1 siRNA (50 nM), and Pd1 siRNA (50 nM) + LPS (5 μg/ml) groups in culture medium for microglia. C , the expression of one colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF), one intercellular cell adhesion molecule (CD54), two inflammatory factors (IL-6 and TNF-α), and four chemokines (CXCL10, CCL12, CXCL9, and CCL5) significantly increased following LPS treatment, while the expression of one chemokine (CCL4) decreased. A significant increase in the expression of one inflammatory factor (TNF-α) and one chemokine (CXCL9) after treatment with Pd1 siRNA + LPS. All data are presented as mean ± SD. Statistical significance was indicated by ∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01, ∗∗∗ p < 0.001, ∗∗∗∗ p < 0.0001, as determined by two-way ANOVA. (Figure 6C: two-way ANOVA; G-CSF, NC siRNA versus Pd1 siRNA + LPS, p = 0.0016, Pd1 siRNA versus Pd1 siRNA + LPS, p = 0.0021; CD54, NC siRNA versus Pd1 siRNA, p = 0.0245, NC siRNA versus Pd1 siRNA + LPS, p = 0.0185; IL-6, NC siRNA versus NC siRNA + LPS, p < 0.0001, NC siRNA versus Pd1 siRNA + LPS, p < 0.0001, NC siRNA + LPS versus Pd1 siRNA, p < 0.0001; Pd1 siRNA versus Pd1 siRNA + LPS, p < 0.0001; CXCL10, NC siRNA versus NC siRNA + LPS, p < 0.0001, NC siRNA versus Pd1 siRNA, p < 0.0001, NC siRNA versus Pd1 siRNA + LPS, p < 0.0001, Pd1 siRNA versus Pd1 siRNA + LPS, p = 0.0481; CCL12, NC siRNA versus NC siRNA + LPS, p = 0.0012, NC siRNA versus Pd1 siRNA + LPS, p = 0.0017, NC siRNA + LPS versus Pd1 siRNA, p = 0.0012; Pd1 siRNA versus Pd1 siRNA + LPS, p = 0.0017; CXCL9, NC siRNA versus Pd1 siRNA + LPS, p < 0.0001, NC siRNA + LPS versus Pd1 siRNA + LPS, p = 0.0156, Pd1 siRNA versus Pd1 siRNA + LPS, p = 0.0145; CCL4, NC siRNA versus NC siRNA + LPS, p < 0.0001, NC siRNA versus Pd1 siRNA, p = 0.0062, NC siRNA versus Pd1 siRNA + LPS, p < 0.0001, Pd1 siRNA versus Pd1 siRNA + LPS, p = 0.0143; CXCL2, NC siRNA versus NC siRNA + LPS, p = 0.0121, NC siRNA versus Pd1 siRNA, p < 0.0001, NC siRNA versus Pd1 siRNA + LPS, p = 0.0017; CCL5, NC siRNA versus NC siRNA + LPS, p < 0.0001, NC siRNA versus Pd1 siRNA + LPS, p < 0.0001, NC siRNA + LPS versus Pd1 siRNA, p < 0.0001, Pd1 siRNA versus Pd1 siRNA + LPS, p < 0.0001; TNF-α, NC siRNA versus NC siRNA + LPS, p < 0.0001, NC siRNA versus Pd1 siRNA + LPS, p < 0.0001, NC siRNA + LPS versus Pd1 siRNA, p < 0.0001, NC siRNA + LPS versus Pd1 siRNA + LPS, p = 0.0442, Pd1 siRNA versus Pd1 siRNA + LPS, p < 0.0001; n = 3–4 separate experiments per group). G-CSF, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor; IL-6, interleukin-6; LPS, lipopolysaccharide; NC, negative control; Pd1, programmed cell death protein 1; qPCR, quantitative real-time PCR; siRNA, small interfering RNA; TNF-α, tumor necrosis factor-alpha.
    Aam Cust Mouse Cytokine Antibody Microarray Kit, supplied by RayBiotech inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/aam-cust mouse cytokine antibody microarray kit/product/RayBiotech inc
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    aam-cust mouse cytokine antibody microarray kit - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    98
    R&D Systems chemokine microarray assay r
    Figure 9. Cytokine and <t>Chemokine</t> expression in the OB and serum of WT, Cx3cr1/ and PLX5622-treated mice. (a) Cytokine and Chemokine <t>microarray</t> assay performed on total tissue lysates of OBs from WT, Cx3cr1 /, and PLX5622-terated mice. Expression levels are presented as arbitrary units, measured by densitometry. Using the Bonferroni procedure to correct for multiple comparisons, no significant changes were found between the expressed cytokines. n = 5, pooled in each group. Two-sample t-test. (b) Cytokine and Chemokine microarray assay performed on serum from WT, Cx3cr1/, and PLX5622-terated mice. Cytokine and Chemokine expression levels were measured by densitometry, and are presented as arbitrary units. Using the Bonferroni procedure to correct for multiple comparisons, significant changes were found in the following molecules: (C5a: WT vs PLX, t(2) =12.1, *p=0.0067; CXCL12: WT vs KO, t(2)=11.7, *p=0.007; TIMP1: WT vs PLX, t(2)=8.1, *p=0.014; ICAM1: WT vs KO, t(2)=10.4, *p=0.009). n = 5 pooled in each group. Two-sample t-test. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.30809.021 The following source data is available for figure 9:
    Chemokine Microarray Assay R, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 98/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/chemokine microarray assay r/product/R&D Systems
    Average 98 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    chemokine microarray assay r - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
    98/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    Allied Biotech Inc mouse cytokine microarray kit
    Figure 9. Cytokine and <t>Chemokine</t> expression in the OB and serum of WT, Cx3cr1/ and PLX5622-treated mice. (a) Cytokine and Chemokine <t>microarray</t> assay performed on total tissue lysates of OBs from WT, Cx3cr1 /, and PLX5622-terated mice. Expression levels are presented as arbitrary units, measured by densitometry. Using the Bonferroni procedure to correct for multiple comparisons, no significant changes were found between the expressed cytokines. n = 5, pooled in each group. Two-sample t-test. (b) Cytokine and Chemokine microarray assay performed on serum from WT, Cx3cr1/, and PLX5622-terated mice. Cytokine and Chemokine expression levels were measured by densitometry, and are presented as arbitrary units. Using the Bonferroni procedure to correct for multiple comparisons, significant changes were found in the following molecules: (C5a: WT vs PLX, t(2) =12.1, *p=0.0067; CXCL12: WT vs KO, t(2)=11.7, *p=0.007; TIMP1: WT vs PLX, t(2)=8.1, *p=0.014; ICAM1: WT vs KO, t(2)=10.4, *p=0.009). n = 5 pooled in each group. Two-sample t-test. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.30809.021 The following source data is available for figure 9:
    Mouse Cytokine Microarray Kit, supplied by Allied Biotech Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/mouse cytokine microarray kit/product/Allied Biotech Inc
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    mouse cytokine microarray kit - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    Cytokine array analysis revealed Pd1-dependent cytokines and chemokines in LPS-treated microglia . A , qPCR showing the decreased Pd1 mRNA in the microglia after Pd1 siRNA (20 nM and 50 nM) treatment for 48 h. All data are presented as mean ± SD. Statistical significance was indicated by ∗∗ p < 0.01, ∗∗∗ p < 0.001, as determined by one-way ANOVA. A : ANOVA, F (2, 12) = 15.32, p = 0.0005; NC siRNA versus Pd1 siRNA 20 nM, p = 0.0022; NC siRNA versus . Pd1 siRNA 50 nM, p = 0.0004; n = 5 wells per group). B , array membranes of protein expression among NC siRNA, NC siRNA + LPS (5 μg/ml), Pd1 siRNA (50 nM), and Pd1 siRNA (50 nM) + LPS (5 μg/ml) groups in culture medium for microglia. C , the expression of one colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF), one intercellular cell adhesion molecule (CD54), two inflammatory factors (IL-6 and TNF-α), and four chemokines (CXCL10, CCL12, CXCL9, and CCL5) significantly increased following LPS treatment, while the expression of one chemokine (CCL4) decreased. A significant increase in the expression of one inflammatory factor (TNF-α) and one chemokine (CXCL9) after treatment with Pd1 siRNA + LPS. All data are presented as mean ± SD. Statistical significance was indicated by ∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01, ∗∗∗ p < 0.001, ∗∗∗∗ p < 0.0001, as determined by two-way ANOVA. (Figure 6C: two-way ANOVA; G-CSF, NC siRNA versus Pd1 siRNA + LPS, p = 0.0016, Pd1 siRNA versus Pd1 siRNA + LPS, p = 0.0021; CD54, NC siRNA versus Pd1 siRNA, p = 0.0245, NC siRNA versus Pd1 siRNA + LPS, p = 0.0185; IL-6, NC siRNA versus NC siRNA + LPS, p < 0.0001, NC siRNA versus Pd1 siRNA + LPS, p < 0.0001, NC siRNA + LPS versus Pd1 siRNA, p < 0.0001; Pd1 siRNA versus Pd1 siRNA + LPS, p < 0.0001; CXCL10, NC siRNA versus NC siRNA + LPS, p < 0.0001, NC siRNA versus Pd1 siRNA, p < 0.0001, NC siRNA versus Pd1 siRNA + LPS, p < 0.0001, Pd1 siRNA versus Pd1 siRNA + LPS, p = 0.0481; CCL12, NC siRNA versus NC siRNA + LPS, p = 0.0012, NC siRNA versus Pd1 siRNA + LPS, p = 0.0017, NC siRNA + LPS versus Pd1 siRNA, p = 0.0012; Pd1 siRNA versus Pd1 siRNA + LPS, p = 0.0017; CXCL9, NC siRNA versus Pd1 siRNA + LPS, p < 0.0001, NC siRNA + LPS versus Pd1 siRNA + LPS, p = 0.0156, Pd1 siRNA versus Pd1 siRNA + LPS, p = 0.0145; CCL4, NC siRNA versus NC siRNA + LPS, p < 0.0001, NC siRNA versus Pd1 siRNA, p = 0.0062, NC siRNA versus Pd1 siRNA + LPS, p < 0.0001, Pd1 siRNA versus Pd1 siRNA + LPS, p = 0.0143; CXCL2, NC siRNA versus NC siRNA + LPS, p = 0.0121, NC siRNA versus Pd1 siRNA, p < 0.0001, NC siRNA versus Pd1 siRNA + LPS, p = 0.0017; CCL5, NC siRNA versus NC siRNA + LPS, p < 0.0001, NC siRNA versus Pd1 siRNA + LPS, p < 0.0001, NC siRNA + LPS versus Pd1 siRNA, p < 0.0001, Pd1 siRNA versus Pd1 siRNA + LPS, p < 0.0001; TNF-α, NC siRNA versus NC siRNA + LPS, p < 0.0001, NC siRNA versus Pd1 siRNA + LPS, p < 0.0001, NC siRNA + LPS versus Pd1 siRNA, p < 0.0001, NC siRNA + LPS versus Pd1 siRNA + LPS, p = 0.0442, Pd1 siRNA versus Pd1 siRNA + LPS, p < 0.0001; n = 3–4 separate experiments per group). G-CSF, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor; IL-6, interleukin-6; LPS, lipopolysaccharide; NC, negative control; Pd1, programmed cell death protein 1; qPCR, quantitative real-time PCR; siRNA, small interfering RNA; TNF-α, tumor necrosis factor-alpha.

    Journal: The Journal of Biological Chemistry

    Article Title: Effect of microglial Pd1 on glial scar formation after spinal cord injury in mice

    doi: 10.1016/j.jbc.2025.108489

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Cytokine array analysis revealed Pd1-dependent cytokines and chemokines in LPS-treated microglia . A , qPCR showing the decreased Pd1 mRNA in the microglia after Pd1 siRNA (20 nM and 50 nM) treatment for 48 h. All data are presented as mean ± SD. Statistical significance was indicated by ∗∗ p < 0.01, ∗∗∗ p < 0.001, as determined by one-way ANOVA. A : ANOVA, F (2, 12) = 15.32, p = 0.0005; NC siRNA versus Pd1 siRNA 20 nM, p = 0.0022; NC siRNA versus . Pd1 siRNA 50 nM, p = 0.0004; n = 5 wells per group). B , array membranes of protein expression among NC siRNA, NC siRNA + LPS (5 μg/ml), Pd1 siRNA (50 nM), and Pd1 siRNA (50 nM) + LPS (5 μg/ml) groups in culture medium for microglia. C , the expression of one colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF), one intercellular cell adhesion molecule (CD54), two inflammatory factors (IL-6 and TNF-α), and four chemokines (CXCL10, CCL12, CXCL9, and CCL5) significantly increased following LPS treatment, while the expression of one chemokine (CCL4) decreased. A significant increase in the expression of one inflammatory factor (TNF-α) and one chemokine (CXCL9) after treatment with Pd1 siRNA + LPS. All data are presented as mean ± SD. Statistical significance was indicated by ∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01, ∗∗∗ p < 0.001, ∗∗∗∗ p < 0.0001, as determined by two-way ANOVA. (Figure 6C: two-way ANOVA; G-CSF, NC siRNA versus Pd1 siRNA + LPS, p = 0.0016, Pd1 siRNA versus Pd1 siRNA + LPS, p = 0.0021; CD54, NC siRNA versus Pd1 siRNA, p = 0.0245, NC siRNA versus Pd1 siRNA + LPS, p = 0.0185; IL-6, NC siRNA versus NC siRNA + LPS, p < 0.0001, NC siRNA versus Pd1 siRNA + LPS, p < 0.0001, NC siRNA + LPS versus Pd1 siRNA, p < 0.0001; Pd1 siRNA versus Pd1 siRNA + LPS, p < 0.0001; CXCL10, NC siRNA versus NC siRNA + LPS, p < 0.0001, NC siRNA versus Pd1 siRNA, p < 0.0001, NC siRNA versus Pd1 siRNA + LPS, p < 0.0001, Pd1 siRNA versus Pd1 siRNA + LPS, p = 0.0481; CCL12, NC siRNA versus NC siRNA + LPS, p = 0.0012, NC siRNA versus Pd1 siRNA + LPS, p = 0.0017, NC siRNA + LPS versus Pd1 siRNA, p = 0.0012; Pd1 siRNA versus Pd1 siRNA + LPS, p = 0.0017; CXCL9, NC siRNA versus Pd1 siRNA + LPS, p < 0.0001, NC siRNA + LPS versus Pd1 siRNA + LPS, p = 0.0156, Pd1 siRNA versus Pd1 siRNA + LPS, p = 0.0145; CCL4, NC siRNA versus NC siRNA + LPS, p < 0.0001, NC siRNA versus Pd1 siRNA, p = 0.0062, NC siRNA versus Pd1 siRNA + LPS, p < 0.0001, Pd1 siRNA versus Pd1 siRNA + LPS, p = 0.0143; CXCL2, NC siRNA versus NC siRNA + LPS, p = 0.0121, NC siRNA versus Pd1 siRNA, p < 0.0001, NC siRNA versus Pd1 siRNA + LPS, p = 0.0017; CCL5, NC siRNA versus NC siRNA + LPS, p < 0.0001, NC siRNA versus Pd1 siRNA + LPS, p < 0.0001, NC siRNA + LPS versus Pd1 siRNA, p < 0.0001, Pd1 siRNA versus Pd1 siRNA + LPS, p < 0.0001; TNF-α, NC siRNA versus NC siRNA + LPS, p < 0.0001, NC siRNA versus Pd1 siRNA + LPS, p < 0.0001, NC siRNA + LPS versus Pd1 siRNA, p < 0.0001, NC siRNA + LPS versus Pd1 siRNA + LPS, p = 0.0442, Pd1 siRNA versus Pd1 siRNA + LPS, p < 0.0001; n = 3–4 separate experiments per group). G-CSF, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor; IL-6, interleukin-6; LPS, lipopolysaccharide; NC, negative control; Pd1, programmed cell death protein 1; qPCR, quantitative real-time PCR; siRNA, small interfering RNA; TNF-α, tumor necrosis factor-alpha.

    Article Snippet: The levels of specific cytokines secreted by microglia were quantified using a mouse cytokine microarray kit (R&D Systems, ARY006).

    Techniques: Expressing, Negative Control, Real-time Polymerase Chain Reaction, Small Interfering RNA

    Figure 9. Cytokine and Chemokine expression in the OB and serum of WT, Cx3cr1/ and PLX5622-treated mice. (a) Cytokine and Chemokine microarray assay performed on total tissue lysates of OBs from WT, Cx3cr1 /, and PLX5622-terated mice. Expression levels are presented as arbitrary units, measured by densitometry. Using the Bonferroni procedure to correct for multiple comparisons, no significant changes were found between the expressed cytokines. n = 5, pooled in each group. Two-sample t-test. (b) Cytokine and Chemokine microarray assay performed on serum from WT, Cx3cr1/, and PLX5622-terated mice. Cytokine and Chemokine expression levels were measured by densitometry, and are presented as arbitrary units. Using the Bonferroni procedure to correct for multiple comparisons, significant changes were found in the following molecules: (C5a: WT vs PLX, t(2) =12.1, *p=0.0067; CXCL12: WT vs KO, t(2)=11.7, *p=0.007; TIMP1: WT vs PLX, t(2)=8.1, *p=0.014; ICAM1: WT vs KO, t(2)=10.4, *p=0.009). n = 5 pooled in each group. Two-sample t-test. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.30809.021 The following source data is available for figure 9:

    Journal: eLife

    Article Title: The role of microglia and their CX3CR1 signaling in adult neurogenesis in the olfactory bulb

    doi: 10.7554/elife.30809

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Figure 9. Cytokine and Chemokine expression in the OB and serum of WT, Cx3cr1/ and PLX5622-treated mice. (a) Cytokine and Chemokine microarray assay performed on total tissue lysates of OBs from WT, Cx3cr1 /, and PLX5622-terated mice. Expression levels are presented as arbitrary units, measured by densitometry. Using the Bonferroni procedure to correct for multiple comparisons, no significant changes were found between the expressed cytokines. n = 5, pooled in each group. Two-sample t-test. (b) Cytokine and Chemokine microarray assay performed on serum from WT, Cx3cr1/, and PLX5622-terated mice. Cytokine and Chemokine expression levels were measured by densitometry, and are presented as arbitrary units. Using the Bonferroni procedure to correct for multiple comparisons, significant changes were found in the following molecules: (C5a: WT vs PLX, t(2) =12.1, *p=0.0067; CXCL12: WT vs KO, t(2)=11.7, *p=0.007; TIMP1: WT vs PLX, t(2)=8.1, *p=0.014; ICAM1: WT vs KO, t(2)=10.4, *p=0.009). n = 5 pooled in each group. Two-sample t-test. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.30809.021 The following source data is available for figure 9:

    Article Snippet: Shaker, Room temp recombinant DNA reagent Details for AAV1 Upenn, PA, U.S.A. Upenn viral core Cat. No. AV-1-PV3365 AAV1 under the CAG promoter, expressing TdTomato commercial assay or kit Cytokine and chemokine microarray assay R and D Systems, MN, U.S.A. Proteome Profiler Mouse Cytokine Array Kit (ARY006) c chemical compound, drug PLX5622 PLEXXIKON Inc., CA, U.S.A. AIN-76A Rodent Diet with PLX5622 1,200 mg PLX5622 (Free Base)/kg chemical compound, drug Control diet PLEXXIKON Inc., CA, U.S.A. AIN-76A Rodent Diet chemical compound, drug BrdU Sigma-Aldrich, MO, U.S.A. Sigma-Aldrich Cat. NO. B5002 10 mg/ml IP injection software, algorithm ImageJ/Figi University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, U.S.A. (http://rsb.info.nih.gov/ij/), (http://fiji.sc/Fiji) (RRID:SCR_003070) software, algorithm Matlab Mathworks Inc., U.S.A. Matlab, R2014a (RRID:SCR_001622) software, algorithm SPSS I.B.M., U.S.A. SPSS, Version 19 (RRID:SCR_002865)

    Techniques: Expressing, Microarray